WAR POETRY | WORLD WAR-1
Greetings,
The blog is the result of Bridge Course activity given by Vaidehi ma'am.This blog contains question- answer regarding 'war-poetry'. The answers provided in this blog is purely based on my views and opinions.Teacher's Blog
Brief Overview of War-Poetry
Q&A
Q] Note down the difference of all the War Poets.
Ans
The war poets each had their unique take and journey during the war. They shared their own perspectives and feelings about the conflict. Wilfred Owen stands out for his vivid and realistic portrayal of the tough realities of war, focusing on the trauma and horrors soldiers faced. His work is a powerful critique against glorifying war. On the flip side, Rupert Brooke took a more patriotic approach, emphasizing the strength and willingness of soldiers and idealizing certain aspects.
Wilfred Wilson Gibson brought a unique and traditional style to his writing, acknowledging war's difficulties but offering a broader view of human experience and resilience. Comparing his style and humanity with Wilfred Owen's is interesting. Siegfried Sassoon, on the other hand, focused on realistic elements and his own journey, blending realism with satire and irony. Initially critical of the war's conduct, his poetry later explores the psychological impact of war, revealing a more complex perspective.
Ivor Gurney's poetry has a lyrical and introspective quality, often reflecting a deep connection to nature and personal reflection. The reflection of nature is notably pronounced in Gurney's verses. Despite their differences, all these poets chased the darkness of war in their own way.
Q] Compare any two poems concerning the subject, style of writing, and patriotism.
Ans
"The Soldier" by Rupert Brooke-
Crafted by Rupert Brooke in the initial year of World War I (1914), "The Soldier" is a profoundly patriotic and idealistic piece that articulates a soldier's deep love for his homeland, particularly England, envisioned as a nurturing paradise. The soldier's bond with England is so profound that he perceives it as both the source of his existence and the destination for his consciousness after death. During its time, the poem resonated strongly with the public, echoing the early fervor for the war before the harsh realities unfolded. In contemporary perspectives, it's deemed somewhat simplistic, lacking the gritty details of war experiences. Yet, it undeniably encapsulates a unique brand of patriotism.
"Dulce et Decorum Est" by Wilfred Owen-
The poem takes a critical look at the glorified image of war, digging into the tough realities and deep trauma faced by soldiers. It questions the idea that sacrificing one's life for the country is always a sweet and honorable act. Instead of painting an idealized picture, the poem vividly shares the genuine experiences, unfolding realistic situations that reflect the raw perceptions of those who actually lived through the challenging times. Through its verses, it untangles the complexities of wartime, presenting a clear contrast to the overly simplified and glorified stories often associated with sacrificing for one's nation.
Comparison of these two poems on the basis of subject, style of writing, and patriotism-
1. Subject -
"The Soldier" poem talks about war as something honorable, suggesting that a soldier's death in a faraway place is a brave sacrifice for England. It says the soldier leaves a lasting mark, making that foreign land a lasting part of England's story. On the other hand, "Dulce et Decorum Est" shows a tough side of war, focusing on the hard experiences soldiers face in the trenches. This poem questions the idea that it's good and right to die for your country, showing the difficult and dehumanizing parts of war. Each poem gives a different view, with one making sacrifice seem romantic and the other revealing the tough truths of armed conflict.
2. Writing Style -
Wilfred Owen used strong and vivid words to show how bad war is because he really didn't like it. He wanted people to see the awful side of war. On the other hand, Rupert Brooke wrote more traditionally, using beautiful language to make dying for your country seem like a good thing.
Brooke's writing is like old poetry with pretty words and positive feelings. Owen, however, wrote in a modern way, expressing how war made him and others feel bitter and disappointed. His words are powerful and real, directly talking about the terrible parts of war without any fancy structure.
So, Owen and Brooke have different styles. Brooke's is like an old, beautiful song, while Owen's is like a direct and strong speech about the hard truths of war.
3.Patriotism-
When we look closely at these poems, we see they talk about loving your country and giving up things for it. Owen, in one poem, doesn't like when people make war sound great; he thinks it's not good and questions blindly following love for your country. On the other side, Brooke's poem is all about feeling good and loving England a lot. Both poems together show us that loving your country and giving up things for it is not simple – it's a mix of good feelings and hard truths.
Q] Do you find any such regional poem/movies/web series/songs that can be compared to any one of the poems Also, give a proper explanation of the similarity.
I am comparing the poem "The Soldier" by Rupert Brooke with 2019 Bollywood film Uri: The Surgical Strike.
"The Soldier" by Rupert Brooke-
Crafted by Rupert Brooke in the initial year of World War I (1914), "The Soldier" is a profoundly patriotic and idealistic piece that articulates a soldier's deep love for his homeland, particularly England, envisioned as a nurturing paradise. The soldier's bond with England is so profound that he perceives it as both the source of his existence and the destination for his consciousness after death. During its time, the poem resonated strongly with the public, echoing the early fervor for the war before the harsh realities unfolded. In contemporary perspectives, it's deemed somewhat simplistic, lacking the gritty details of war experiences. Yet, it undeniably encapsulates a unique brand of patriotism.
Uri: The Surgical Strike-
'Uri: The Surgical Strike,' a powerful 2019 Indian Hindi-language military action film. Directed by debutant Aditya Dhar and produced by Ronnie Screwvala, this gripping movie takes you on a journey through a fictionally dramatized account of the real-life response to the 2016 Uri attack. With Vicky Kaushal in the lead as Major Vihaan Shergill of the Para (Special Forces), the film unfolds the heroic events alongside a stellar cast, including Yami Gautam, Paresh Rawal, Kirti Kulhari, and Mohit Raina. The movie is an adrenaline-pumping tale of courage and resilience.
Similarities:
Both "The Soldier" by Rupert Brooke and the Bollywood film "Uri: The Surgical Strike" share a common thread of patriotism and a deep connection to one's homeland. In "The Soldier," this connection is poetic and reflective, portraying the soldier's eternal rest as a part of England, with a sense of pride and sacrifice.
Similarly, in "Uri: The Surgical Strike," the characters display a profound love for their country as they undertake a mission in response to a real threat. Both the poem and the film highlight the idea of sacrifice for the greater good, whether it's through the soldier's symbolic eternal rest in England or the military actions depicted in the film to defend the nation.
While the expressions of patriotism differ in tone and context, the underlying theme of love for one's country and the willingness to make sacrifices for it is a commonality between Rupert Brooke's poetic vision and the cinematic portrayal in "Uri: The Surgical Strike.
Thank you, to read up to here.
Comments
Post a Comment